Pages

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Ender's Game revisit Anticpation Guide



Garrett Kitchen
March 5, 2013
“Lying is Justifiable if it's for the greater good.”
After reading Ender’s Game my opinion on lying hasn’t changed. If anything, reading Ender’s game has helped strengthen my arguments and opinions against lying. Although if the only way to save the world, in Ender’s case, or to benefit the greater good is to lie then it may be okay, but still no very justified. If one lies they must be prepared for the anger of the people they lied to. “He began to get angry…dodging their congratulations, ignoring their hands, their words, their rejoicing.” (296-297) This quote is from the part of the book where Ender kills the planet in the game, and Mazer tells him that he was actually commanding the third invasion. The fact that Ender was lied to about such an important even, even to save the world, angers and upsets him, and he pushes away his peers and acquaintances.
“Sometimes violence is the only way to solve a problem.”
I rated this a two for my last anticipation guide because “usually there is a way around solving a problem using violence, although it is harder to accomplish your goal and can take more effort to solve the problem nonviolently.” Reading Ender’s Game has changed my rating to a four, because I agree with this statement. In certain situations when an enemy is hell bent on destroying you, the only way to solve the problem is to act violently. “If I’m to walk away from here, I have to win quickly, and permanently…This time it will be my body that breaks, unless I break him first.” (209) This excerpt from the book is when Ender is realizing, after trying to talk Bonzo out of it, that the only way to walk out of the fight is to brutally beat Bonzo, violently. The only time that one is going to solve their problems violently (when that is the only way) and it can be avoided. Is when the bullied or victim in the situation is going to confront their enemy, and they’re the one coming to their enemy, they can talk to them and try to remedy the situation in non-violent ways.
“It is okay to kill someone in self-defense.”
Before reading Ender’s Game I rated this statement with a four, and after reading the book I rate this statement with a four. In the past I rated this as a four because “…if someone is trying to harm and maybe kill or molest you, and you can stop them, they usually deserve to be killed and if you're okay with the moral and legal consequences then it is okay.” My views and reasons for agreeing with this statement haven’t change much, although another reason it is okay to kill someone in self-defense is on accident, obviously if one accidently kills someone then they were probably being pretty aggressive, and in their heart of hearts they had the intention of killing their assailant. If anything Ender’s Game has taught me this philosophy. “Ender knew that at this moment he might be able to walk out of the room and end the battle. But the battle would only be fought again…The only way to end things completely was to hurt Bonzo enough that his fear was stronger than his hate…I didn’t want to hurt him!” (211-213) Even though Ender was claiming to not want to hurt Bonzo, that killing him was an accident, his heart’s true intention was to cripple and possibly kill Bonzo. During the fight he knew he had to be brutal and vicious towards Bonzo, it is simply the nature of human preservation.

“Words are stronger than fists.”
In the past I rated this at a four, because I thought that fighting could be avoided in almost every situation and replaced with words, but my opinion has shifted to the view that the remedy to a problem really depends on the situation and the people involved, therefore I rate this statement a three. For example when Ender sent a message out that read “I love your butt. Let me kiss it.”(51) Using Bernard’s name instead of fighting him, because Ender knew he could solve his problem with sabotage instead of physical violence. Although during other situations Ender acted violently because he knew that in that situation it was the only way to solve his problem. “This would not have a happy ending. So Ender decided that he’d rather not be the unhappiest at the end…Ender kicked out high and hard, catching Stilson square in the breastbone. He dropped.”(7) This excerpt from the book is when Stilson and his pack of cronies are harassing Ender, so he decides the only way to solve the issue of never being bullied again is to beat up Stilson, using violence.
“Bullies hurt others because they have low self-esteem.”
After reading Ender’s Game my opinions on this statement haven’t really changed. I would still rate this a three, the only thing that really has changed is that the book gave me more alternative reasons to why Bullies hurt others. I rated the statement a three, because bullies do hurt others because they have low self-esteem, but they also hurt other for a plethora of different reasons. Bullies can hurt others because they enjoy making others suffer, or because it is the only way they know how to communicate with others, or the way they were raised could have given them that nature, or because the bully has too much honor. “You’re such a genius, you figure out to handle me.” (209) This quote is what the bully character, Bonzo, said to Ender before they fought. It is an example of how Bonzo has low self-esteem, so he is mocking Ender about how smart he is, when really he is jealous of Ender. Bonzo also has copious amounts of honor, so because Ender was four years younger than Bonzo, but still better in everything he did, it threatened his honor. At one point in the book, at the part where they are about to fight Ender taunts Bonzo and it really makes him angry. “Your Father would be proud of you. He would love to see you now, come to fight a naked boy in a shower, smaller than you, and you brought six friends. He would say, Oh, what honor…Shut your mouth, Wiggin.” (208-209) Bonzo gets so angry because Ender made him realize that the way he was acting gave him less honor, and that his father would be ashamed of him.
“Only the best and brightest students should receive the best education to become a nation's leaders.”
In the past I rated this a four, but after reading Ender’s Game I rate this a three. My views on this topic didn’t change because of what was in the book, they changed because I had more time to consider how I felt about this, and to realize my past opinion was a bit arrogant. I rate this a three, because I think that the people who have proven themselves best fit to lead nations should receive the education for it.  It seems as if a lot of the people fit to lead will be the best and brightest, although there are always people who aren’t the smartest, but are some of the best leaders the world ever has.
“Revenge is never justified.”
After reading Ender’s Game I rated this two, just like before I read Ender’s game. I disagree with this statement, because I think Revenge definitely is justified in many situations. Although there are contrasts in every opinion, especially this one.  I think that revenge isn’t always justified, and if one is taking revenge on a relative of their tormenter just because the actual tormentor is gone, well that is not justified or humane. In my first anticipation guide I said “A Jewish person wanting to get revenge and hurt the modern day, 2013, Germans isn't justified because they weren't there for the holocaust it was their ancestors, so they didn't make that decision. They don't deserve the harm the person might inflict on them.” In the book when Ender kicked Stilson in the chest to get revenge for and make him stop making fun of him (7).
“Crying is evidence of weakness.”
I rated this statement a one before reading Ender’s Game, because I strongly disagreed with it. After reading the book my opinion hasn’t changed at all, except that I disagree with this statement even more. One can cry out of joy or sorrow, not because they’re week, but because crying is a way to express and feel different emotions. If crying was evidence of weakness, then having emotions and expressing them would be week. If someone one was close to died, they cry because they want to show they cared about the person, and that they’re sad that the deceased person is gone. “…tears seeping out of his closed eyelids and disappearing in the water on his face… I didn’t want to hurt him! Ender cried. Why didn’t he just leave me alone!”(213) Ender was crying after he unintentionally killed Bonzo, because he needed to convey that he didn’t want to hurt Bonzo, and he was sorry he did. Additionally, the crying showed that Ender was unhappy that he cause more pain and suffering.
“Any action is acceptable in war.”
In the past I rated this a one because I completely disagreed with this statement. After reading Ender’s Game, I rate this a three because I think certain actions that wouldn’t be justifiable in regular life would be justifiable in war, but certain actions aren’t even justified during war time. If a solider goes to one of the civilian’s homes of the enemy’s country and then tortures his family in front of him because they’re enemies, that isn’t justified. It’s disgusting and inhumane, and even if it’s war time and there’s chaos, that doesn’t make it okay. “Of course we tricked you into it. That’s the whole point, said Graff. It had to be a trick or you couldn’t have done it.” (298) I picked this quote, because it is a good example of actions that are justifiable and not justifiable in war. Lying to a teenager to get him to perform better during war is justifiable. But lying to a teenager in war to get him to cause the genocide of a race is not justifiable. This is because; stopping one from making the decision that causes the genocide of an entire race is sickening and inhumane.
“Teenagers need discipline and rules because they can't control themselves.”
In the past I rated this a three, because “teenagers need discipline and rules, but not because they can't control themselves. I think they need rules and discipline because they're learning how to function in the world, and without rules they would go crazy with their freedom.” And after reading Ender’s Game I will continue to rate this statement a three, because it really depends on the teenager’s personality and their intelligence. It can go either way. In the book Peter beats up Ender and terrorizes him, which causes part of his life to be miserable, but if their parents disciplined Peter, Ender’s life could’ve been better. Also Ender doesn’t need very much discipline or very many rules because he is son intelligent and controlled that he sets his own boundaries, and doesn’t make amateur mistakes.
“Only through personal sacrifice can someone create positive change.”
Before reading Ender’s Game I rated this a two, because I disagreed with this statement. After reading the book I rate this three, because there are other ways to create positive change. One doesn’t have to sacrifice very much to create positive change, in some cases all they have to sacrifice is a little bit of personal time. In other cases time, money, and emotional fire is sacrifice to create positive change. In the cases with more sacrifice more change is created. In the book Ender personally sacrificed a lot to create the positive change of the Buggers being gone. This is an example of if you sacrifice more the change is greater.
“Generating compassion for your enemies is the only way to create peace.”
Before reading Ender’s Game I rated this a five, because I strongly agreed with it. After reading the book, I agree with my statement. As long as your enemy is left over from a war, they will still be your enemy. The only way to create peace with your enemy besides generating compassion for them is completely killing every last one of your enemy, even the women and every single child of theirs, and all their allies or semi-allies. After being the major participant in the xenocide of the Buggers Ender generates compassion for them. “..always Ender carried with him a dry white cocoon, looking for the world where the Hive-Queen could awaken and thrive in peace.” (324) Ender hunts for a place to rehabilitate the Buggers, to create peace with them.



Thursday, February 28, 2013

Ender's Game questions 12-15


Chapter 12
11.      Ender provoked Bonzo by mentioning honor, and how Bonzo’s father would want him to have honor, and not fight a little kid with multiple accomplices. Bonzo responded by fighting Ender one on one, but also getting very angry with him.
22.      Stilson was a bully that was bullying Ender, and was going to beat him up, but Ender attacked him first and beat him brutally. Ender was thinking of Stilson because like Bonzo, Ender beat them both brutally when they were fighting Ender in a bullying manner.
33.      Ender still expects help from his teachers because he is still a kid, and they say he is there tool to save the human race, so if they need him why let him get killed or mortally injured.
4.4.     “The sickening way Stilson’s bones had given way.” (209) “Bonzo collapsed, fell to the side, and sprawled directly under the spray of steaming water from a shower.” (211) “…the empty dead look in his eyes. He was already finished then. Already unconscious….just that dead stupid look on his face, that terrible look, the way Stilson looked when I finished him.”(212) “Only the second death in the history of the school. At least it wasn’t suicide this time.” (226) These quotes from the book is all evidence that Ender killed Stilson and Bonzo, that they were dead after Ender fought them.
55.      I think Ender was justified in the murders of Bonzo and Stilson. For one he didn’t attack either of them first, in fact he tried to stop them from getting involved in a fight with Ender. Also Ender logically killed them, if there is such a thing. He accidently killed them, he just brutally beat them up, and so they would never attack him again.
Chapter 13
1.       What this quote means is if one creates a fake identity with different beliefs than their own. The person with the fake identity adopts the beliefs of their alter ego. For example, when Valentine writes as Demosthenes, she adopts some of his ideas and beliefs.
2.      I believe that it is a natural instinct for humans to be killers. Although I think that most of the time it isn’t a good instinct for us to be killers. It does come in handy for humans to be killers, because if one gets in a bad situation the killer, self-preservation instinct, could save your life.
3.      What Ender reveals about himself and his enemies is that they are similar, because he has studied them, and that maybe they aren't that different. That the buggers and he think similar in the sense of innovative war tactics.
4.      Peter and Ender’s roles have shifted in Valentine’s life by Peter being the main brother in her life and that she isn’t as afraid of Peter as of Ender. Valentine loves Peter, but also she doesn’t completely trust him. She still loves Ender but not as much as Peter, and now she is kind of afraid of him.
5.      The war with the buggers was inevitable according to Graff because the humans and buggers will never be able to communicate, so will never be able to talk about a peace treaty. Also there isn’t room for two races in on universe, and the Buggers attacked Earth first so they want us dead, so war is going to happen.
Chapter 14
1.       What disturbs Ender about Eros is that it’s crowded and the floors slope up instead of down. How Ender figures out the truth about Eros is Mazer tells him that it was a bugger outpost.
2.      Mazer is going to be the real teacher Ender ever has is because Mazer is the only person smarter than Ender. Additionally Mazer is the only person who actually will teach Ender something that he hasn't figured out himself.
3.      Mazer was dishonest with Ender because if Ender knew he was sending real living men to their death, and causing the genocide of a whole race he wouldn't have been able to handle it.
4.      I think they pushed the children too far, but only because I think it wasn't necessary to attack the buggers. If I thought it was I would think it was necessary to push the children that hard.
5.      Neither Genocide nor xenocide is ever justified. The annihilation of an entire race or group is never okay; in fact it’s disgusting and even if the race is evil, the race can be forgiven and change. The xenocide of the Buggers wasn't inevitable because the Buggers were going to leave the Humans alone, but now the Humans had to invade the Buggers and kill them off.
Chapter 15
1.       After what has happened in Ender’s life what he would think of this statement is that he would be angry that he didn't realize this earlier in his life. Also He would be confused because he did things for people that he didn’t love.
2.      Ender’s beliefs about the deaths of Bonzo and Stilson is that the trial said it was for Graff, but really it was an attack on him, it was meant to make him look like an insane criminal. Also he thinks that it is ironic that they consider those murders a crime but not the xenocide of the Buggers.
3.      Valentine made sure that Ender could never return to earth, because if he did Peter would use Ender as a tool to keep himself in power by showing that Ender was his brother, and he would just make Enders life a stressful political mess.
4.      What’s Ironic about Valentine stating that Peter has saved millions of lives, because he has terrorized Valentines and Ender’s lives, and because he had Valentine write as Demosthenes which pretty much started the human war? Additionally Ender took millions of lives, even though it would seem as if it should be the other way for peter and Ender.
5.      The knowledge Ender gained to write the Hive Queen came from the Bugger egg. It shared its memories and ideas with him when he came in physical contact with it. "We did not mean to murder, and when we understood, we never came again. We thought we were the only thinking beings in the universe…" (321). This is the hive queen transferring its knowledge about how it didn't want to attack Earth again.
6.      Ender publishes the book using the pseudonym, Speaker for the Dead, because he doesn't want people to read the book because he wrote it, he wants people to read the book for what it is. He also doesn't want to be famous anymore, he just wants to spread the knowledge that the buggers weren't evil, and were intelligent beings.


           
           
           

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

CEJ 5

February 26, 2013
Garrett Kitchen
CEJ Five
Wave of Immigrants Released Ahead of Automatic Budget Cuts
            Recently many illegal immigrants have been released into the US by Federal Immigration officials to save the government money. The immigrants still have deportation cases that will remain in court (nytimes.com). “It’s abhorrent that President Obama is releasing criminals into our communities to promote his political agenda on sequestration, by releasing criminal immigrants onto the streets, the administration is needlessly endangering American lives.” (Representative Robert W. Goodlatte, chairman of the Judiciary Committee) Goodlatte, among other republicans are angry with Obama, and think it is his scheme to deal with the immigration negotiation. Detaining illegal immigrants in the US is very expensive. The cost could be reduced by about $100-$150(National Immigration Forum).
            I have no personal involvement in illegal immigration. I think that it is sad that so many good people are detained for fleeing the terrible situations in their countries and coming to America “the promise land” and being detained. It is unfair that many people have to illegally enter the US, because their own countries won’t cooperate and let them come here. Fortunately this article had no bias, because I enjoyed learning more about this event and illegal immigration, and I may not have read it if the author’s opinions leaked into his article. I think this is a god way for the government to save money, but I think the immigration officials should look into alternative cheaper ways of detainment. 

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Orson Scott Card Article Response


February 26, 2013
Garrett Kitchen
            I am disgusted by individuals who oppose gay rights and same-sex marriage. I feel that this is equivalent to black rights and women’s rights; I feel that there is no freedom in America until everyone here has equality. When Card said “Marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down."  I was appalled and surprised. I cannot believe that someone who wrote such an open minded bromancy book, Ender’s Game, would threaten to attempt to destroy a government that legalized same-sex marriage. Although I am pro-gay rights, I still love Ender’s Game and many other books written by Card. Card can still be very creative and open minded in other ways in his books, I don’t think his gay rights opinion affect his books. I don’t think that Mr. Vack should remove Ender’s Game from his curriculum, because the book doesn't show an anti-gay points of view, in fact it is very open minded in other way that I admire. For example, when Ender finds the Bugger egg, he is searching for a place to rehabilitate the Bugger race in an attempt to undue his genocide. I think this reflects on America should’ve tried more to undue it’s mistreatment of African-Americans and the genocide of American Indians. I think it is a pathetic attempt to try to keep Card “out of the limelight” and the movie company should let Card talk about the movie, but try to avoid his anti-gay views. Just like letting the book remain in Mr. Vack’s curriculum, I think the movie should be allowed to continue on to release date boycott free. Even though Card will benefit financially from the movie, he still deserves money for the great story that is Ender’s Game.

An Ode to Water


February 26, 2013
Garrett Kitchen
Flowing, gurgling, splashing
Oh water
Your beauty so serene
Your graceful acts of nourishment
Water, sweet ambrosia
Like a benevolent goddess
Granting us life
Sustaining us
I gave up on other liquids
Oh water
How you gift me with simply being
Water
I love you

Friday, February 15, 2013

Ender’s Game Questions chapters 9-11






Garrett Kitchen
February 12th, 2013

Chapter 9 – Locke and Demosthenes
1.       In the internal and unspoken battle between Peter and Valentine, I think Peter is winning. Peter is manipulating Valentine, by tempting her with power, and acting like he is regretful and sad about the way he used to treat Ender. Peter really has the power, he gets Valentine to write like him, but in turn he has to write like her. This makes it so Peter has more power, because he got Valentine to write in the first place, but they also can’t write without each other.
2.      How Locke and Demosthenes relate to Peter and Valentine’s personas is that Locke was a liberal, just like the type of writing Peter is going for. Demosthenes was a revolutionary, and he was opposed against change, and he tried to start a war with Macedonia. In this case Valentine’s writing is geared towards opposing change, and going to war with Russia.
3.      Ender is still angry because even when a letter from Valentine finally made it through to him, it was because Graff had forced Valentine to write it. All it said was how he wasn’t like Peter, and that made him realize that Graff was the one dictating what could be said in the letter, and the only reason they had her write it was because they wanted to solve Ender’s fear of being like Peter. It made him extra angry because Graff had used Valentine, the thing Ender loved most, and forced her onto their side.
3.
Chapter 10 – Dragon
1.       Ender is a strong, but not abusive leader. A leader one respects and one trusts to lead them in the right direction, but not a leader to be messed with or questioned. Ender is this kind of leader, because of the way he observed how tyrannical and cruel Bonzo was, he observed how Rose the Nose was too laid back and relaxed, and learned good leadership skills from Dink.
2.      What Ender did to Bean was exactly what Graff did to Ender. He singled him out as the smartest kid in his army, and made the rest of his army resent Bean because he made them all look bad. Why Ender did this to Bean is because, habit are formed from the way one is previously treated, but also because it will bring out the strength in Bean, just like it did for Ender.
3.      The word Salaam means peace. What this tells me about the power of religious identity is it forms one's personality, and it gives someone a place to belong, and creates powerful ideas and beliefs
4.      What’s important about the end of this chapter is it tells the reader how Ender feels about the battle school, and how he is going to beat the teachers some way because he is angry with them for making Valentine into their tool, and making Alai a stranger and not a close friend. For the most part I think the teacher didn’t want Ender to have this reaction, because now he hates them even more, and wants to defeat them, because currently they are the Ender’s greatest enemies. The only part of this reaction the teachers meant Ender to have is a little bit of anger, and solitude, because with his anger he will perform better as a commander, and it will bring out the strength in him.
Chapter 11 – Veni Vidi Vici
1.       The computer knows Ender so well, because it can view any file the government has on him, even the monitor file, but it also observes how he plays the fairy game, and can shape it to his personality when he plays the game. The computer doesn’t really know Ender very well it just knows all the physical and psychological information, but doesn’t actually know him in real life. So the computer doesn’t understand what Ender’s true personality is, and how he will act in certain situations.
2.      “Yes. That’s the worst that could happen. I can’t lose any games. Because if I lose any--” (page 198) What this means is that if Ender loses any games the other commanders will see his weaknesses, he will lose against his personal enemies the battle school teachers and I.F., and he won’t be the amazing leader he is to his army and to the leaders of I.F.3.             
3.      The battle school teachers are pushing Ender so hard, because they believe to squeeze the utmost success and brilliance out of Ender, to make him the tool for human survival; they must push him to the limit. During war with the Buggers he won’t have someone to be soft on him; the Buggers will have no mercy.

4.      The importance of the last two sentences of chapter eleven is that it takes the perspective Bean. Before bean goes to bed the last thing he thinks of a dozen ideas for the special task force he will lead in case of emergencies. Bean thinks that all of the ideas were stupid, but Ender would be pleased. Ender will be pleased with what seems like stupid ideas, because to win battles one has to think of ridiculous stupid seeming ideas that will succeed. For example, Ender shoots orders his army to shoot their legs, which seems ridiculous, but actually their frozen legs function as state of the art shields, and if they push of the wall they don’t need them.

5.          “Veni Vidi Vici”, which means I came, I saw, I conquered, is an appropriate title to this chapter because Ender came to the battle school, observed how it worked, became a commander, and conquered as the best commander to play in the War games ever.



Monday, February 11, 2013

Drone Response


Garrett Kitchen
February 11, 2013
Our Government can kill anyone
            I am not pro military. When I hear about these remote controlled drone killing machines I get upset. The Idea of war drones is a good one. If you fly a plane without a person flying in it, then if it gets shot down nobody dies. But seeing someone on a camera rather than in real life it makes it easier to kill them, because even if you fully understand that. The person on a streaming video is real one cannot understand how alive their target is. For example, I play Call of Duty, an online first person shooter video game, and I shoot my enemies without remorse, I know that there aren't real people, but the graphics look like real life. What if I was controlling a robot, and killing my enemies, it is a lot easier to kill without hesitation if one isn’t there with their enemies. I am glad the US has drones for civilian non-violent uses. There are drone traffic cams, drones that the stunning pictures, and drones that people use for entertainment. But it would be simple to have experienced personnel put guns on the modified drones, or build a homemade bomb that detonates on impact and perform obscene acts of terrorism on anyone, at anywhere, from anywhere with an app one’s phone. Drones relate to Ender’s Game because the government can do anything they want, and kill anyone they deem so. A document was just released that said could kill anyone a US citizen or not, if they deem that the person poses a threat to America. In Ender’s game the government forces Ender’s parents to have a third child, just because they deem it a possibility to save the world. Then the government basically robs Ender of his childhood because they think it might save the world. They said they gave Ender a choice even though they really didn't  Just like the document speaks of killing the individual if they are a terrorist, and they threaten our country, but really they can kill the individual regardless.

CEJ 4


Garrett Kitchen
February 11, 2013
The ‘Die Hard’ Quandary
Nocera, Joe
nytimes.com
February 11, 2013
Opinion
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/opinion/nocera-the-die-hard-quandry.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
        This Wednesday, A Good Day to Die Hard, the fifth movie in the Bruce Willis starred series. Like done for many franchises of movies, the Regal and AMC theatre companies are featuring a twelve hour marathon of all five movies (Joe Nocera, nytimes.com). The general plotline of all the movies is John McClane (Bruce Willis) an ex lieutenant of the NYPD and LAPD, has to save the nation from terrorists attacking others, himself, or the nation. The author’s opinion on the franchise is that he sides with the second amendment abolitionists, and relates violent imagery back to the pornography issue, which would lead to the abolition of the first amendment. The author touches on a larger topic, but doesn't delve into it.
        I immediately disagreed with the Nocera. I believe that the shooting in Connecticut is a real issue, but if our government banned all weapons, or even assault weapons, who’s to say it will stop illegal import of the banned weapons. Crack, meth, Heroin, and many other drugs are illegal, yet the import and use of these illegal drugs is still a prominent issue in America. On the topic of violent imagery affecting peoples anger and tendency to do violent things, I don’t disagree with it may having some effect on people’s aggression, but I don’t think prohibiting violent content. The people, who perform these disgusting acts of violence, also have mental disabilities or are negatively affected by their social lives, along with many people on earth, playing violent video games. Additionally I disagree with the way our country has portrayed pornography and sex as an act or image worse than violence. I don’t believe that creating lives should be treated as more naughty than taking them, although I do not support teen pregnancy. Obviously the author’s article was bias, because it was an opinion, but I think it was bias towards banning guns because he works for the New York Times, which is generally a more liberal newspaper. I think my opinion was also bias, because on the gun issue I may be a democrat, but I own guns and enjoy hunting and target shooting. I was also bias on the imagery issue, because I am from a younger generation, where sex is not as shielded from the youth as it used to be.


Friday, February 8, 2013

CEJ 3


Garrett Kitchen
February 8, 2013

In California, Reading the Snow to Tell the Future for the Water SupplyCalifornia

Onishi, Norimitsu
nytimes.com
February 7th, 2013
US
            This month Frank Gehrke California’s chief snow surveyor plunged a long silver tube into the snow to figure out the results of the Sierra Nevada’s snowpack survey. “There’ve been only incremental changes…This course is very uniform, which is normal, because the snowpack during accumulation is kind of uniform. But once you start getting into the melt, it starts to go crazy.” (Frank Gehrke). The results of the Snowpack survey determine the water distribution to the districts in that area. The Sierra Nevada survey is very important indicator of how much snowmelt water will be supplied to the river that in turn supply water to the rivers that help the one million acres of farmland in California (nytimes.com). A good stake of America’s water supply comes from the Sierra Nevada snowmelt, so California has to edit its water plans for the year depending on the outcome of the survey. “Fresno County is the No. 1 agricultural county in the nation, but we also happen to be situated climatically in the middle of a desert,” he said. It really is the Sierra Nevada snowpack that makes this desert bloom.” (Ryan Jacobsen, executive director of the Fresno County Farm Bureau)
            At first I thought that viewing the Sierra Nevada snowpack survey as the Groundhog Day was odd, but after studying how much affect this snowmelt has on my state I understand. It is amazing to see how much our society depends on the snow, something so taken for granted by everyday people. It was interesting to learn that the Sierra Nevada, a fairly luscious place, is actually a desert. In my opinion this article was slightly boring, but I learned a lot of new information. The article was purely informational, although every once in a while I think that a bias can make an article interesting.